Tham khảo Đông y

  1. Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Introduction
  2. “Chinese Medicine in Taiwan - Does it Really Work?”. Taiwanese Secrets Travel Guide. ngày 24 tháng 9 năm 2017.
  3. “Macao 'to be' traditional Chinese medicine hub - Business - Chinadaily.com.cn”. www.chinadaily.com.cn.
  4. “Chinese Medicine | Hong Kong Tourism Board”. www.discoverhongkong.com.
  5. y-sinsehs-on-the-rise “Young Đông y sinsehs on the rise” Kiểm tra giá trị |url= (trợ giúp). The Straits Times. ngày 21 tháng 2 năm 2017.
  6. 1 2 Stephen Barrett. “Be Wary of Acupuncture, Qigong, and 'Chinese Medicine'”. Truy cập ngày 11 tháng 12 năm 2013.
  7. Steven Novella (ngày 25 tháng 1 năm 2012). “What Is Traditional Chinese Medicine?”. Science-based Medicine.
  8. Singh & Ernst 2008, tr. 72Lỗi harv: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFSingh_&_Ernst2008 (trợ giúp)
  9. Singh & Ernst 2008, tr. 107Lỗi harv: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFSingh_&_Ernst2008 (trợ giúp)
  10. Singh & Ernst 2008, tr. 387Lỗi harv: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFSingh_&_Ernst2008 (trợ giúp)
  11. Shang, A.; Huwiler, K.; Nartey, L.; Jüni, P.; Egger, M. (2007). “Placebo-controlled trials of Chinese herbal medicine and conventional medicine comparative study”. International Journal of Epidemiology. 36 (5): 1086–92. doi:10.1093/ije/dym119. PMID 17602184.
  12. Shaw D (2012). “Toxicological risks of Chinese herbs”. Planta Medica. 76 (17): 2012–18. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1250533. PMID 21077025.
  13. “Traditional Chinese Medicine and Endangered Animals”. Encyclopædia Britannica.
  14. Zhang, Fang; Kong, Lin-lin; Zhang, Yi-ye; Li, Shu-Chuen (2012). “Evaluation of Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life and Cost Effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials”. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 18 (12): 1108–20. doi:10.1089/acm.2011.0315. ISSN 1075-5535. PMID 22924383.
  15. “Hard to swallow”. Nature. 448 (7150): 105–06. 2007. Bibcode:2007Natur.448S.105.. doi:10.1038/448106a. PMID 17625521. Constructive approaches to divining the potential usefulness of traditional therapies are to be welcomed. But it seems problematic to apply a brand new technique, largely untested in the clinic, to test the veracity of traditional Chinese medicine, when the field is so fraught with pseudoscience. In the meantime, claims made on behalf of an uncharted body of knowledge should be treated with the customary scepticism that is the bedrock of both science and medicine.